|
Operations Cost Example
We compare a conventional legacy data center with one populated with liquid cooled servers using direct touch technology. Even though some studies indicate that the cooling overhead could be as little as 5% of IT load for the direct touch system, we have assumed the more pessimistic number of 15%. Even so, a net energy saving of 36% is achieved. While this represents a substantial $1.1M in energy cost reduction, it also offers the data center owner the opportunity to add 2,800 more servers with the same amount of power as servers can be packed much more densely.
|
Air Cooled 1U Sun servers |
Liquid Cooled Sun 1U servers |
IT power (W) |
300 |
300 |
Fans (W) |
50 |
0 |
Power supply efficiency |
89% |
89% |
Total server power (W) |
393 |
337 |
Cooling Overhead |
55% |
15% |
Distribution overhead |
3% |
3% |
Total power/server (W) |
628 |
399 |
5000 Servers (KW/yr) |
3139 |
1996 |
Energy Cost per KWh |
$0.11 |
$0.11 |
Annual power cost |
$ 3,024,919 |
$ 1,923,681 |
Saving |
|
36% |
|
|
|
Power density (W/sq-ft) |
100 |
809 |
Required Area (sq-ft) |
19663 |
2083 |
Lease rate/year/sq-ft |
$ 60 |
$ 60 |
|
|
|
Lease cost |
$ 1,179,775 |
$ 125,000 |
Electrical plant depn & maint |
$ 3,024,919 |
$ 1,923,681 |
Cooling plant depn & maint |
$ 536,679 |
$ 125,457 |
Annual power cost |
$ 3,024,919 |
$ 1,923,681 |
Opex |
$ 7,766,293 |
$ 4,097,820 |
Saving |
|
47% |
The table is derived from actual measurements made on Sun servers with and without fans. The Opex computation is derived from Chakandra Patel's (HP Labs HPL-2005-107R1) model.
|

|